| IATA/ICAO CODE: |
HKG/VHHH |
| CITY: |
Hong Kong |
| COUNTRY: |
Hong Kong |
AIRPORT CONTACT
Information updated by the airport 5/2008
| Name: |
Yuyu K.F. Tse |
Martin Putnam |
| Title: |
Assistant Environmental Manager |
Coporate Environmental Manager |
| Airport: |
Hong Kong International Airport |
Hong Kong International Airport |
Address:
|
Airport Authority Hong Kong
HKIA Tower, 1 Sky Plaza Road, Hong Kong International Airport
Lantau
Hong Kong
|
Airport Authority Hong Kong
HKIA Tower, 1 Sky Plaza Road, Hong Kong International Airport
Lantau
Hong Kong |
| Phone: |
+852 2183 6647 |
+852 2183 6645 |
| Fax: |
+852 2802 8012 |
+852 2802 8012 |
| Email: |
yuyu.tse@hkairport.com |
|
| Airport Web Site: http://www.cad.gov.hk/english/ac_noise.html
- Aircraft Noise Management. |
ELEVATION: 19 ft.
| RUNWAY
INFORMATION |
| Orientation |
Length (m) |
Displaced
Threshold (m) |
Glide Slope(deg) |
Width (m) |
| 07L/25R |
3800 |
07L/173
25R - 174 |
3 |
60 |
| 07R/25L |
3800 |
07R - 160
25L/0 |
3 |
60 |
NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES
|
1. ICAO Noise Abatement Departure Procedure
RWY 07L/RWY 07R
1.1 ICAO have developed aircraft operating procedures, Noise
Abatement Departure Procedure 1 (NADP 1) and Noise Abatement Department
Procedure 2 (NADP 2), for the take-off climb to ensure that the
necessary safety of flight operations is maintained whilst minimizing
exposure to noise on the ground.
1.2 NADP1 is intended to provide noise reduction for noise sensitive
areas in close proximity to the departure end of the runway. NADP
2 provides noise reduction to areas more distant from the runway
end.
1.3 All operators are to adopt either NADP 1 or NADP 2 procedures
for all take-offs on RWY 07L or RWY 07R. Operators are not required
to inform CAD of the adopted procedure.
1.4 Full details of NADP 1 and NADP 2 are contained in ICAO Procedures
for Air Navigation Services - Aircraft Operations, Volume 1 -
Flight Procedures, (PANS-OPS, Doc 8168, Volume 1).
2. Noise Mitigating Measures
2.1 GENERAL
2.1.1 The following noise abatement procedures are implemented
daily to reduce aircraft noise levels particularly at night time,
when operating conditions permit. These measures include:
a) Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) Procedure for RWY 25L/25R;
b) Preferential use of RWY 07L/07R;
c) Noise Mitigating SIDs RWY 07L/07R;
d) Special ATC handling procedures.
2.2 CONTINUOS DESCENT APPROACH (CDA) PROCEDURE
2.2.1 As a noise mitigating measure, between 1501 and 2300 UTC,
arrivals to RWY 25L/25R may expect an ILS/DME approach with a
continuous descent approach (CDA) procedure subject to the prevailing
traffic situation.
2.2.2 CDA Procedure
a) Aircraft on the CDA procedure are expected to achieve a continuous
descent profile approximating a 3°vertical profile from 8000
ft to intercept the glidepath at 4500 ft or above. During a CDA
pilots should maintain a low thrust setting and should not have
recourse to level flight.
b) Aircraft will be given radar vectors from about 27 NM from
touchdown (12 NM to FAP), to intercept the LOC outside of the
FAP (RWY 25L LOTUS, IFL DME 15 NM - RWY 25R RIVER, ITFR DME 15
NM ). The estimated track miles to touchdown will be passed with
descent clearance and further distance information may be given
as required.
c) The recommended speed for the CDA intermediate approach segment
is 210 - 225 KIAS, this should permit a relatively clean configuration
for as long as practicable. The published speed restrictions for
the final approach segment are applicable for the CDA procedure,
viz. 180 KIAS at FAP and between 150 - 160 KIAS at OMF, 4 NM from
touchdown.
d) If aircraft cannot comply with the CDA procedures or speed
limitations, the pilot should advise ATC in good time so that
alternative arrangements can be made.
2.3 PREFERENTIAL USE OF RWY 07L/07R
2.3.1 As a noise mitigating measure between 1601 and 2300 UTC,
RWY 07L/07R will be nominated as the runway-in-use whenever the
tailwind component, including gust values is 10 kt or less when
the runway is dry, or 5 kt or less when the runway is not dry.
During this period RWY 25L/25R may be used if operationally required,
e.g. unserviceability of navigation aids, adverse weather conditions,
aircraft performance, traffic situations, etc.
2.4 NOISE MITIGATING SIDS RWY 07L/07R
2.4.1 As a noise mitigation measure between 1501 and 2300 UTC,
all departures from RWY 07L/07R east-bound (e.g. via ELATO), north-bound
(e.g. via BEKOL), or southeast-bound (e.g. via NOMAN), may expect
the appropriate ATENA, LOGAN, RASSE or SKATE SID via BREAM. These
noise mitigating SIDs route over the West Lamma Channel and avoid
overflight of densely populated areas.
2.4.2 Pilots should comply with the published speed control restriction
(220 KIAS maximum) until established on track to RAMEN. Pilots
of aircraft flying with on-board FMS/RNAV equipment are reminded
that the waypoints PORPA and ROVER are "fly-over" positions.
To ensure clearance from terrain the initial right turn to RAMEN
must not be commenced until passing PORPA or ROVER.
2.5 SPECIAL ATC HANDLING PROCEDURES
2.5.1 As a noise mitigating measure between 1501 and 2300 UTC,
departures from RWY 25L/25R may expect to remain on the appropriate
SID track until passing 9000 ft or until they are south of Lantau
Island, before being provided with radar vectors, as appropriate.
Note : All noisy aircraft, which do not comply with the noise
standard in Chapter 3 of Annex 16 Volume 1, Part II to the Convention
on International Civil Aviation, are not allowed to land and take
off in Hong Kong round the clock |
CONTINUOUS DESCENT
ARRIVAL (CDA)
| 2. Noise Mitigating Measures
2.1 GENERAL
2.1.1 The following noise abatement procedures are implemented
daily to reduce aircraft noise levels particularly at night time,
when operating conditions permit. These measures include:
a) Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) Procedure for RWY 25L/25R;
b) Preferential use of RWY 07L/07R;
c) Noise Mitigating SIDs RWY 07L/07R;
d) Special ATC handling procedures.
2.2 CONTINUOS DESCENT APPROACH (CDA) PROCEDURE
2.2.1 As a noise mitigating measure, between 1501 and 2300 UTC,
arrivals to RWY 25L/25R may expect an ILS/DME approach with a
continuous descent approach (CDA) procedure subject to the prevailing
traffic situation.
2.2.2 CDA Procedure
a) Aircraft on the CDA procedure are expected to achieve a continuous
descent profile approximating a 3°vertical profile from 8000
ft to intercept the glidepath at 4500 ft or above. During a CDA
pilots should maintain a low thrust setting and should not have
recourse to level flight.
b) Aircraft will be given radar vectors from about 27 NM from
touchdown (12 NM to FAP), to intercept the LOC outside of the
FAP (RWY 25L LOTUS, IFL DME 15 NM - RWY 25R RIVER, ITFR DME 15
NM ). The estimated track miles to touchdown will be passed with
descent clearance and further distance information may be given
as required.
c) The recommended speed for the CDA intermediate approach segment
is 210 - 225 KIAS, this should permit a relatively clean configuration
for as long as practicable. The published speed restrictions for
the final approach segment are applicable for the CDA procedure,
viz. 180 KIAS at FAP and between 150 - 160 KIAS at OMF, 4 NM from
touchdown.
d) If aircraft cannot comply with the CDA procedures or speed
limitations, the pilot should advise ATC in good time so that
alternative arrangements can be made.
Regarding the Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) issue, the information
is shown as below:
(1) CDA procedures are used for HKIA. Subject to the prevailing
wind direction and wind speed, traffic situation etc., the use
of CDA procedures are allowed during the hours between 2300 hrs.
and 0700 hrs.
(local time).
(2) CDA procedures were used during 60 overnight periods in the
year 2007, from 2300 hrs. to 0700 hrs (local time), i.e. the total
hrs. with CDA used = 8 hrs. x 60 nights = 480 hrs. The % of time
with CDA used = 480 hrs. / (24 hrs. x 365 days) = 5.48% |
AIRPORT CURFEWS - NONE
PREFERENTIAL RUNWAYS
| See Noise Abatement Procedures above for details. |
OPERATING QUOTA - NONE
ENGINE RUN-UP RESTRICTIONS
| 9. Engine Tests and Ground Runs
9.1 Engine run-ups are subject to the following conditions:
(a) An engine ground run is defined as any engine start up not
associated with a planned aircraft departure.
(b) Engine ground runs at ground idle power for a duration not
exceeding ten minutes may be carried out on aircraft parking bays
limited to two engines at a time and must be fully supervised
by ground staff.
(c) Engine runs above ground idle power shall be carried out
in the engine run-up facility and engine ground runs at idle power
for a duration in excess of ten minutes shall only be carried
out in approved locations. All engine ground runs must be fully
supervised by ground staff.
(d) Maintenance or test running of jet engines not mounted on
an aircraft is prohibited unless performed in a test cell of adequate
design.
9.2 Engine Ground Run Procedures
9.2.1 Initial requests for above ground idle engine run should
be made to the Airport Authority Apron Control Center via the
Authority’s website. The airline aircraft maintenance agent
engineer or mechanic in charge of the engine test is responsible
for ensuring that all safety precautions against injury to persons
or damage to properties, aircraft, vehicles and equipment in the
vicinity, are adopted.
9.2.2 When ready to conduct the engine run, the pilot or authorized
engineer shall obtain startup clearance from Apron Control on
frequency 121.775 MHz, and a listening watch shall be maintained
on the frequency throughout the engine run. The aircraft anti-collision
beacons must be activated for the entire duration of the ground
engine run and Apron Control shall be advised on completion of
the engine run.
9.2.3 The ground crew in charge must maintain communication with
cockpit personnel and be able to stop the engine run immediately
if directed. |
APU OPERATING RESTRICTIONS
| No restriction applies to APU operation currently but this is
subject to review. |
NOISE BUDGET RESTRICTIONS - NONE
NOISE SURCHARGE - NONE
NOISE MITIGATION/LAND
USE PLANNING PROGRAM INFORMATION
| Type
of Program |
Date
Implemented |
Status |
| Sound Insulation (Residences and Public
Buildings) |
N/A |
- |
| Purchase Assurance for Homeowners Located
Within the Airport Noise Contours |
N/A |
- |
| Avigation Easements |
N/A |
- |
| Zoning Laws |
1990 |
The Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines
Chapter 9 stipulates that certain noise sensitive uses should not
be located within specified NEF contours. |
| Real Estate/Property Disclosure Laws |
N/A |
- |
| Acquire Land for Noise Compatibility to
date |
N/A |
- |
| Population within each noise contour level
relative to aircraft operations |
1998 |
<500 (<NEF 25) |
| Airport Noise Contour Overlay Maps |
1998 |
- |
| Total Cost of Noise Mitigation Programs
to Date |
N/A |
|
| Source of Noise Mitigation Program Funding
for Aircraft Noise |
1998 |
Engine testing noise barrier ($63M) |
| Noise Abatement Procedures |
1998 |
The Civil Aviation Department (CAD) have
adopted several noise abatement procedures especially for night
time operations to better manage potential disturbance to local
communities due to aircraft operations. For more details, please
visit CAD's website at http://www.cad.gov.hk/english/ac_noise.html. |
NOISE MONITORING SYSTEM
The implementation of the above noise abatement procedures
are closely monitored by the Civil Aviation Department. An aircraft
noise and flight track monitoring system with noise monitoring terminals
installed at various locations under or near the landing and take-off
flight paths is in place to help monitor aircraft noise and the
implementation of the noise mitigating measures.
At present, there are a total of sixteen noise monitoring terminals
installed which are located respectively at Sha Lo Wan, Tung Chung,
Yan O, Ting Kau, Tai Lam, Tsing Yi (2 nos.), Kwai Chung, Tai Wai,
Mid-levels in Central, North Point, Jardine’s Lookout, Shaukeiwan,
West Tsuen Wan, Tsing Lung Tau and Ma Wan. |
FLIGHT
TRACK MONITORING SYSTEM
| See information under Noise Monitoring System |
NOISE LEVEL LIMITS - NONE
CHAPTER 2 RESTRICTIONS
| From July 1, 2002, aircraft other than those
complying with ICAO Annex 16 Volume I, Part II, Chapter 3, are
restricted from operation at the airport.
Under Section 3 of the Civil Aviation (Aircraft Noise) Ordinance,
a subsonic jet aircraft must not land or take off in Hong Kong
unless there is in force in respect of that aircraft a noise certificate
issued by the aeronautical authority of a country which is a party
to the International Civil Aviation Organization or other documentary
proof of compliance by the aircraft with the Chapter 3 standards
of noise.
(Note: "Chapter 3 standards of noise" means the standards
of noise specified in Volume I, Part II, Chapter 3 of Annex 16
to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
The noise certificate or documentary proof of compliance must
be carried on the aircraft and must be produced by the commander
of the aircraft for inspection if he is requested to do so by
any authorized officer. |
CHAPTER 2 PHASEOUT
| See Stage 2 Restrictions above. |
CHAPTER 3 RESTRICTIONS - NONE
|