| IATA/ICAO CODE: |
GMPL/RKSS |
| CITY: |
Seoul |
| COUNTRY: |
South Korea |
AIRPORT CONTACT
Information updated by the airport 2/2009
| Name: |
Gimpo Airport Office |
Title:
|
Seoul Regional Aviation Administration |
| Airport: |
Gimpo International Airport |
Address:
|
Gimpo Airport Office
Seoul Regional Aviation Administration
274 Gwahaw-Dong
Seoul 157-701
Republic of Korea |
| Phone: |
+82 2 2660 2184 or 2145 |
| Fax: |
+82 2 2662 5083 |
| Email: |
|
| Airport Web Site: http://gimpo.airport.co.kr/eng/index.jsp |
ELEVATION: 18m
|
RUNWAY INFORMATION
|
| Orientation |
Length (m)
|
Displaced
Threshold (m)
|
Glide Slope(deg)
|
Width (m)
|
| 14L/32R |
3600
|
-
|
-
|
45
|
| 14R/32L |
3200
|
-
|
-
|
60
|
| NOTE: The airport is no
longer used for international flights as it now functions as a domestic
airport. In the early 2001, Incheon International Airport launched
its operation and took over the international flight services once
served by the Gimpo airport. |
NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES
1. Aircraft Operating
Procedures (except helicopter)
1.1 Take-off
All departing aircraft should apply ICAO PANS-OPS (Doc 8168) Volume
1 Noise Abatement Take-off Climb Procedures as follows:
1. Noise Abatement Take-off Climb Procedure One (NADP 1)
Thrust reduction at 1000 ft or 1500 ft above the airport elevation
recommended.
1.2 Approach
1. Delayed Flap Setting Procedures
All arriving aircraft shall apply delayed flap approach procedure
as follows:
a. When Runway 14 in use:
- After intercepting LLZ, lower gear.
- Maintain intermediate flap untilFAF. (Refer to AIP Republic
of Korea, AIP AD 2.22.1.2 Speed Control)
- AtFAF, set flaps for landing and establish final approach
speed
b. When Runway 32 in use:
- After 7 ILS/DME (8 DME FR KIP), lower gear.
- Maintain intermediate flap until FAF. (Refer to AIP Republic
of Korea, AIP AD 2.22.1.2 Speed Control)
- At FAA, set flaps for landing and establish final approach
speed.
2. Aircraft unable to comply with this procedure for any reason
should inform ATC.
3. Exception
Procedures described in the provisions 1 and 2 need not be complied
with, for aircraft who have passed the IAF (for RWY 32) or intercept
the LLZ (for RWY 14) in adverse operating conditions such as
the following:
a. If the runway is not clear and dry, i.e. it is adversely
affected by snow, slush, ice, water or other substances;
b. In conditions when the ceiling is lower than 500ft and above
AGL, or when the horizontal visibility is less than 1.9 KM;
c. When the cross wind component, including gusts, exceeds 15KT
d. When the tail wind component, including gusts, exceeds 5KT
e. When wind shear has been reported or forecasted.
3. Starting check only is available between 1400 UTC to 2100
UTC.
4. Aircraft flying along the VFR route for P73 shall maintain
at or above 1500 ft while in GIMPO control zone for noise abatement
and use caution for traffic approaching runway 32 at Gimpo Airport. |
AIRPORT CURFEWS
| All take-offs and landings are restricted from 1400 UTC and 2100
UTC except for emergency, special mission and other abnormal conditions. |
PREFERENTIAL RUNWAYS
| Preferential runway system will be applied as follows: |
|
1. Runway 14 in use:
- take-off: Runway 14L
- Landing: Runway 14R
2. Intersection take-offs are not available for all runways except
when circumstances require for flow of traffic or other reasons
|
OPERATING QUOTA - NONE
ENGINE RUN-UP RESTRICTIONS
Engine test runs are only allowed between 1400 UTC and 2100 UTC.
The airport has a Run-Up Pad and the following applies:
a. Hours of Operation: Available between 30 minutes after sunrise
and 30 minutes before sunset
b. The use of the Run-up Pad may be permitted only under prior approval
obtained from the control tower
c. A continuous communication with the control tower shall be maintained
in an aircraft (including vehicles, equipment and personnel) on
the Run-Up Pad.
d. No maintenance is permitted on the Run-Up Pad (except compulsory
maintenance during run-up. |
APU OPERATING RESTRICTIONS - NONE
NOISE BUDGET RESTRICTIONS - NONE
NOISE SURCHARGE
Updated by the airport 2/2009
The noise surcharge is a percentage of the landing fee base upon
airplane group. |
Landing Fee
Basis: Maximum take-off weight (any fraction of 1 ton to be calculated
at 1 ton) in the certificate of airworthiness. |
| International Landings |
| Up to 100 tons:
Over 100 to 200 tons:
Over 200 tons:
Minimum Charge
|
KRW 8200 per ton
KRW 8000 per ton
KRW 7800 per ton
KRW 150000 |
| Domestic Landings |
|
Up to 10 tons:
10 to 25 tons:
Over 45 tons:
|
KRW 8935 per landing
KRW 1717 per ton
KRW 2515 per ton |
| Noise surcharges are effective since July 1993. The
fee is based on airplane group (1-5). The groups listed in the fax
I received on April 12, 1993 is identical to that for France airports,
Orly and Charles de Gaulle. |
| The aircraft classes determined by the Aviation Act
- Rep. of Korea according to ICAO Annex 16 Volume 1: |
|
Class 1:
|
Aircraft not conform with Chapters 2 &
3, or noise certification data not submitted. |
|
Class 2:
|
Aircraft conform with 2.4.1 and 2.5.1 or Chapter 2 |
|
Class 3:
|
Aircraft conform with 2.4.1 of Chapter 2 or 2.4.2
and 2.5.1 of Chapter 2. |
|
Class 4:
|
Aircraft conform with 2.4.2 of Chapter 2, or with
3.4.1 and 3.5.1 of Chapter 3. |
|
Class 5:
|
Aircraft conform with 3.5.1 of Chapter 3. |
| Shown below are the additional percentage of the
landing fee charged based on airplane group. Note that even for
the quiet airplanes, a fee of 10% is charged. The surcharges are
for all South Korean airport. |
Group 1 30%
Group 2 25%
Group 3 20%
Group 4 15%
Group 5 10%
|
| Group 1 |
|
Aerojet Commander
BAC111 (without noise suppression
B-7-7
B-720
B-727 (without noise suppression)
B-737/100 and 200 (without noise suppression)
B747 (nacelles 100A, 100C, 200A, 200C)
Caravelles III and VI
Comet
Concorde
Convair 880/990
DC-8 (except DC-8/71/72/73)
DC-9/30 (without Part 36)having a mass of 53 tonnes or more
DC-9/50 (without Part 36)
Hansa Jet
IL-62
IL-76
Jetstar 1
KC-5
Learjet 24B/24C/25B
MS760 Paris
Sabre 40
SVC-10
Trident
Tupolev
VC-10
Westwind 1123
|
Group 2
BAC111 (with noise suppression, except series 200 with Spey 506
engine)
B-727 (with JT8d-17 jet engines (with noise suppression nacelles
and engines having a mass of 91 tonnes or more))
B-737/100 and 200 (with noise suppression nacelles and engines having
a mass of 49 tonnes or more)
Caravelle 10/11/12/Super
DC-9/20 (without Part 36)
DC-9/30 (without Part 36 and having a mass of less than 53 tonnes)
DC-9/34 (with Part 36 and JT8D-17 jet engines)
DC-9/40 (without Part 36)
DC-9/50 (with Part 36 except JT8D-15 jet engines and having a mass
of less than 53 tonnes)
IL-86
IL-62M having a mass of less than 167 tonnes
Mercure
Tupolev 134A/B having a mass of 47 tonnes or less
All noise certificated jet aircraft not mentioned in groups 3,4
or 5 |
Group 3
BAC111 Series 200 with Spey 506 engine
B-727 with JT8D-7/9/15 jet engines (with noise suppression nacelles
and engines)
B727 with JT8D-17 jet engines (with noise supression nacelles and
engines and having a mass of less than 91 tonnes)
B-737/100 and 200 (with noise suppression nacelles and engines having
a mass of less than 49 tonnes)
B-747 (with JT9D jet engines except JT9D-70A, JT9D-7Q and JT9D-7R4G2)
DC-9/10
DC-9 Series 30 & 40 (with Part 36), except JT8D-7A jet engines
DC-9 Series 30 & 40 (except DE-9/34 with Jt8D-17 jet engines)
DC-9/50 (with Part 36 with JT8D-15 jet engines and having a mass
of less than 53 tonnes)
Fokker 28
Gulfstream 2,3
HS-125 (except 700)
IL-62M having a mass of 167 tonnes or more
Learjet Series 20 (except 24B/C, 25B, 24E, 24F)
Mystere 20 (except Mystere 20G, 200)
Sabre 60
Tupolev 154B |
Group 4
B-747 SP (except with RB211 jet engines)
B-747 SR (except with CF6 jet engines)
B-747 (with CF6-50 jet engines)
B-747 (with Jt9D-70A, JT9D-7Q, JT9D-7R4G2 engines)
B-747 (with RB211-524 jet engines)
DC-9 all series (with Part 36 and JT8D-7A jet engines)
DC-10/30 (with CF6-50C, C1 jet engines)
DC-10/30 (with CF6-50C2, C2B, C2R jet engines and having a mass
of 256 tonnes or more)
Jetstar 2
Learjet Series 24E/24F
Sabre 75A, 80
VFW-614
YAK-40 All non-noise certificated propeller driven aeroplanes
Non-noise certificated helicopters |
|
Group 5
Airbus A300, A310
BAe-146
B-737/300
B-747 SP (with RB211 jet engines)
B-747SR (with CF6 jet engines)
B-757
B-767
Canadiar Challenger
Citation
Corvette
Diamond II
DC-8/71, 72 and 73
DC-9/80
DC-10/10
DC-10/30 (with CF6-50C2, C2B, C2R jet engines and having a mass
of less than 256 tonnes)
DC-10/40 (with JT9D-20 jet engines)
DC-10/40 (with JT9D-59 jet engines and having a mass of less than
256 tonnes)
HS-125/700
Learjet Series 30 & 50
L-1011
Mystere 10
Mystere 20G, 200
Mystere 50
Mystere Falcon 900
Sabre 65
Westwind 1124
Noise certificated propeller driven aeroplanes
|
NOISE MITIGATION/LAND
USE PLANNING PROGRAM INFORMATION
| The airport has a noise mitigation program that includes
soundproof windows and doors in residence and facilities where the
airplane noise level is more than 80 WECPNL (called the noise damage
zone). Check
the airport's website for more information. |
|
Type of Program
|
Date Implemented
|
Status
|
| Sound Insulation (Residences and Public
Buildings) |
-
|
yes |
| Purchase Assurance for Homeowners Located
Within the Airport Noise Contours |
-
|
- |
| Avigation Easements |
-
|
- |
| Zoning Laws |
-
|
- |
| Real Estate/Property Disclosure Laws |
-
|
- |
| Acquire Land for Noise Compatibility to
date |
-
|
- |
| Population within each noise contour level
relative to aircraft operations |
-
|
-
|
| Airport Noise Contour Overlay Maps |
-
|
- |
| Total Cost of Noise Mitigation Programs
to Date |
-
|
-
|
| Source of Noise Mitigation Program Funding
for Aircraft Noise |
-
|
- |
NOISE MONITORING SYSTEM
|
As reported on the Gimpo Airport's web site - the airport has
nine noise monitors installed that are linked to radar allowing
the routes and noise levels generated by each airplane passing
through the noise zone to be tracked.
|
FLIGHT
TRACK MONITORING SYSTEM
| Yes - see information under Noise Monitoring System |
NOISE LEVEL LIMITS - NONE
CHAPTER 2 RESTRICTIONS - NONE
CHAPTER 2 PHASEOUT
| This airport is located in a country that is an ICAO Contracting
State. It is not known if this country adopted the ICAO recommendation
(Resolution A28-3) for the phase out of Chapter 2 airplanes. |
CHAPTER 3 RESTRICTIONS - NONE
|