As a result of guaranteed residual values
of assets or guaranteed income streams under credit guarantees,
BCC is abated from
asset impairments on the guaranteed aircraft to the extent of
guarantee coverage. If an asset impairment is calculated on a
guaranteed aircraft, the impairment charge is generally recorded
in the Other segment. If the guarantee amount is insufficient to
cover the full impairment loss, the shortage is recorded by BCC.
Due to intercompany guarantees, the BCC accounting classification
of certain third party leases may differ from the accounting
classification in the consolidated Company financial statements
(i.e. sales-type lease at BCC, operating lease in the consolidated
financial statements; or leveraged lease at BCC, sales-type
lease in the consolidated financial statements). In these cases,
the accounting treatment at BCC is eliminated and the impact
of the consolidated accounting treatment is recorded in the
Other segment.
The following table provides the financial statement impacts
of intercompany guarantees and asset impairments, lease accounting
differences, and other subsidies. These amounts have been
recorded in the Other segment.

During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Other segment
recorded asset impairment charges of $66 related to the impairment
of a long-held investment in equipment trust certificates secured
by aircraft on lease to United Airlines, $66 related to the
impairment of 717s returned to the Company by AMR, and $80
related to an increase in the customer financing valuation
allowance resulting from guarantees provided to BCC. The 717
impairment charge was offset by a $60 AMR lease termination
fee recorded in earnings during the fourth quarter by the Other
segment in the ‘Lease accounting differences’ caption above.
The ‘Accounting differences/eliminations’ caption of net earnings
also includes the impact of cost measurement differences
between generally accepted accounting principles and federal
cost accounting
standards. This includes the following: the difference between
pension costs recognized under SFAS No. 87,
Employers’ Accounting for Pensions, and under federal cost accounting standards,
principally on a funding basis; the differences between retiree health care
costs recognized under SFAS
No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,
and under federal cost accounting standards, principally on a cash basis; and
the differences in timing of cost recognition related to certain activities,
such as facilities consolidation, undertaken as a result of mergers and acquisitions
whereby such costs are expensed under generally accepted accounting principles
and deferred under federal cost accounting standards. Additionally, the amortization
of
costs capitalized in accordance with SFAS No. 34, Capitalization
of Interest Cost, is included in the ‘Accounting differences/eliminations’ caption. |