|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements Years
ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 Note
1 Principles
of consolidation Use
of estimates
Sales and other operating revenues Contract
and program accounting Commercial aircraft programs are planned, committed and facilitized based on long-term delivery forecasts, normally for quantities in excess of contractually firm orders. Cost of sales for the 737, 747, 757, 767 and 777 commercial aircraft programs is determined under the program method of accounting based on estimated average total cost and revenue for the current program quantity. The program method of accounting effectively amortizes or averages tooling and special equipment costs, as well as unit production costs, over the program quantity. Because of the higher unit production costs experienced at the beginning of a new program and the substantial investment required for initial tooling and special equipment, new commercial jet aircraft programs normally have lower operating profit margins than established programs. The initial program quantities for the 777 program and the 737-600/700/800/900 (Next-Generation 737) programs had been established at 400 units, the same initial program quantity as used for the 747, 757 and 767 programs. Deliveries for the 777 program began in 1995, and deliveries for the Next-Generation 737 program began in 1997. The estimated program average costs and revenues are reviewed and reassessed quarterly, and changes in estimates are recognized over current and future deliveries constituting the program quantity. Cost of sales for the MD-80, MD-90 and MD-11 aircraft programs is determined on a specific-unit cost method. To the extent that inventoriable costs are expected to exceed the total estimated sales price, charges are made to current earnings to reduce inventoried costs to estimated realizable value. Inventories Share-based
plans
Interest expense
Income taxes Postretirement
benefits Cash
and cash equivalents Short-term
investments Property,
plant and equipment Goodwill
Note
2 Merger
with McDonnell Douglas Corporation The merger was subject to approval by the United States Federal Trade Commission and the European Commission. Future requirements or obligations associated with obtaining these approvals are not expected to have a material impact on future operations or liquidity of the Company. Acquisition
of Rockwell aerospace and defense business
Note 3 In the fourth quarter of 1997, the Company completed an assessment of the financial impact of its post-merger strategy decisions related to its McDonnell Douglas Corporation commercial aircraft product lines and recorded a special charge of $1,400 relative to these decisions. The charge principally represents an inventory valuation adjustment based on post-merger assessments of the market conditions and related program decisions and commitments. Also included in the charge were valuation adjustments in connection with customer financing assets. The applicable programs currently in production are the MD-11 trijet and the MD-80 and MD-90 twinjets. Additionally, the MD-95 twinjet, now referred to as the 717 model program, is currently in development, with first delivery scheduled for 1999. The MD-80 and MD-90 twinjets and the MD-11 trijet will continue to be produced through 2000. Note
4 Operating costs and expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations include costs of $127, $102 and $53 for the years ending December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively, representing the Company’s share of losses from joint venture arrangements in the developmental stages accounted for under the equity method. The Company’s principal joint venture arrangement in the developmental stages is a 40% partnership in the Sea Launch program, a commercial satellite launch venture with Norwegian, Russian and Ukrainian partners. Additionally, the Company recognized income of $60, $59 and $2 for the years ending December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively, attributable to non-developmental joint venture arrangements. The Company’s 50% partnership with Lockheed Martin in United Space Alliance is the principal non-developmental joint venture arrangement. United Space Alliance is responsible for all ground processing of the Space Shuttle fleet and for space-related operations with the U.S. Air Force. The weighted average number of shares outstanding (in millions) used to compute basic earnings per share were 966.9, 970.1 and 968.7 for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The weighted average number of shares outstanding (in millions) used to compute diluted earnings per share were 976.7, 970.1 and 981.9 for the same respective years. Basic earnings per share are calculated based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding, excluding treasury shares and the outstanding shares held by the ShareValue Trust. Diluted earnings per share are calculated based on that same number of shares plus additional dilutive shares representing stock distributable under stock option plans computed using the treasury stock method plus contingently issuable shares from other share-based plans. Because 1997 results reflected a net loss from continuing operations, both basic and diluted earnings per share were calculated based on the same weighted average number of shares for that year. Accounts receivable at December 31 consisted of the following: Accounts receivable included the following as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively: amounts not currently billable of $381 and $587 relating primarily to sales values recorded upon attainment of performance milestones that differ from contractual billing milestones and withholds on U.S. Government contracts ($109 and $161 not expected to be collected within one year); $93 and $341 relating to claims and other amounts on U.S. Government contracts subject to future settlement ($66 and $333 not expected to be collected within one year); and $48 and $62 of other receivables not expected to be collected within one year. Inventories at December 31 consisted of the following: As of December 31, 1998, there were no significant excess deferred production costs (inventory production costs incurred on in-process and delivered units in excess of the estimated average cost of such units determined as described in Note 1) or unamortized tooling costs not recoverable from existing firm orders for commercial programs other than the 777 and the Next-Generation 737 programs. The program quantity for the 777 and the Next-Generation 737 programs for determining cost of sales based on estimated average total cost (including inventory production costs and tooling) and revenue was initially established at 400 units. In 1998 the accounting quantity for the Next-Generation 737 program was extended beyond the initial program quantity. The current accounting quantity for the Next-Generation 737 program is 1,200 units. Inventory costs at December 31, 1998, included unamortized tooling of $2,022 and $760 relating to the 777 and Next-Generation 737 programs, and excess deferred production costs of $1,654 and $329 relating to the 777 and Next-Generation 737 programs. Inventory costs at December 31, 1997, included unamortized tooling of $2,678 and $809 relating to the 777 and Next-Generation 737 programs, and excess deferred production costs of $2,384 relating to the 777 program. Firm backlog for both the 777 and Next-Generation 737 programs is sufficient to recover all significant amounts of excess deferred production costs as of December 31, 1998; however, such deferred costs are recognized over the current program accounting quantity in effect at the date of reporting. Interest capitalized as construction-period tooling costs amounted to $20, $33 and $30 in 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. As of December 31, 1998 and 1997, inventory balances included $231 subject to claims or other uncertainties primarily relating to the A-12 program. See Note 21. The estimates underlying the average costs of deliveries reflected in the inventory valuations may differ materially from amounts eventually realized for the reasons outlined in Note 22. The Boeing Company and Subsidiaries |