How engineers chase turbulence for smoother flights

From simulators to test runs in the Rockies, inside the decades-long work to calm the ride for crew and passengers.

March 30, 2026 in Commercial, Technology

Three engineers stand in front of a wall filled with models of Boeing airplanes Ryan Pettit, Paul Strefling and Shubhank "Shubi" Gyawali (left to right) pose in front of models of Boeing airplanes. (Maddie Crisalli photos © Boeing)

From labs and simulators in the Pacific Northwest to windy skies near the Rocky Mountains, engineers in Boeing's Flight Controls and Stability and Control (S&C) departments have been working for decades on one goal: finding solutions to turbulence to make everyone's ride in the skies a little smoother 

Why it matters: Most turbulence affects ride quality — the bumps passengers feel — not airplane structure. Better sensing, faster control responses and robust testing reduce shaking, lowers injury risk and gives crews more time to respond when conditions worsen.  

  • Ryan Pettit and Paul Strefling are Associate Technical Fellows in Flight Controls, specializing in automated fly-by-wire controls.  
  • Shubhank “Shubi” Gyawali works in Aerodynamics for S&C, assessing flying qualities and ride comfort. 

Catch up quick: Over decades, turbulence mitigation moved from analog fixes to model‑based, multi‑sensor control systems. Strefling recalled a turning point on the 777‑9 program. After an early test system “didn't work well enough,” Strefling said, “I drank a bunch of coffee and stayed up for, like, two nights straight. … I realized that we could solve this by using more surfaces and sensors. And then two years later, we flew it and it worked.”  

  • That shift led to using multiple sensors and actuators across the airplane — a multi‑input, multi‑output modal suppression approach that raises performance and complexity and will be applied to all future Boeing airplanes.  
“After seeing what we test and how extreme some of the conditions are that we evaluate against, I’m very comfortable now,” Gyawali said. “My parents would be too.”

People first: Gyawali’s experience — growing up in Nepal and later feeling nervous as a flyer — drives his focus on passenger comfort. “After seeing what we test and how extreme some of the conditions are that we evaluate against, I’m very comfortable now,” he said. “My parents would be too.” 

How the controls work: Designers build two main functions. Modal suppression, which dampens structural bending so the wings and fuselage stop “dancing” in turbulence; and gust suppression, which counters whole‑airplane translations and rotations. Sensors — accelerometers, airspeed and angle‑of‑attack vanes, and dedicated gust sensors — feed algorithms that move elevators, ailerons and the rudder in milliseconds to oppose disturbances.  

  • Pilots give commands and “the computer figures out how to move all the flight surfaces to achieve it, while trying to reject disturbances from turbulence,” Petit explained.  
  • “The atmosphere is chaotic. When the airplane gets introduced to this chaotic, unpredictable atmosphere, it gets excited,” Gyawali adds. “And now I need to manipulate my control surfaces … so that my airplane doesn't get as dynamically excited. Or, in other words, if my airplane is dancing in this cloud of atmosphere, I'm making it, like, a bad dancer, making it more stiff.” 

From desktop to turbulence hunting: Most design begins in high-fidelity simulation, then moves to Boeing’s Multi-Purpose Engineering Cabin (MCAB) — a full-motion simulator whose abilities include mimicking turbulence — and ends with flight validation. MCAB provides real-time feedback within the simulator so engineers can gauge ride quality and pilot response before testing the design on an actual flight. 

  • Once in flight -test, engineers seek turbulence hotspots — mountain waves near the Rockies are a go‑to — and fly controlled tracks through the air mass to compare control laws with sensors and counterweights off and on.  
  • Flight tests are intense; clipboards and pens can end up airborne as crews push control surfaces to allowed limits to gather real data. 

Sensing and prediction: Long-range light detection and ranging (LIDAR) is the next frontier. Current LIDAR faces limits — weight, power, inconsistent returns in very clean air — and must meet strict integrity standards before it can inform automatic control laws. If viable, LIDAR could let engineers look ahead and preposition control surfaces before the gusts hit, rather than reacting after the fact.  

Modeling, data and limits: Advances in atmospheric modeling and computing lets teams run thousands of randomized scenarios and refine algorithms with large datasets. Still, turbulence remains partly random. Strefling described an “epiphany” from flight data: “I just couldn’t get over how random it was.” Engineers can improve the ride much of the time, but extreme, rare events exceed control authority and require avoidance and warning. 

The engineers say the work is making rare events less frequent. “We’ve been able to characterize turbulence more robustly and granularly. We can look for trends in this enormous randomness and feed that into better control-law prototyping, more effective sensor usage and more reliable simulation environments,” Pettit said. 

Go Deeper: Pettit, Strefling and Gyawali shared their perspective with New Yorker writer Burkhard Bilger for a recent feature story “Buckle Up for Bumpier Skies,” about the impact of storms and winds on instances of turbulence, and the work underway by engineers to try and mitigate it.